Built the same way, on two different foundations.
Track, Lab, and Compass run on a validated instrument: assessed, scored, reported, and handed to a human decision-maker. Map runs on real, current law in that instrument's place, classified, grounded, attested, and signed off by a named Executive. Different foundation, same discipline: build the infrastructure, never invent the underlying standard.
Four stages, the same every time.
This breakdown is specific to the assessment products. Map's own four stages sit further down this page, built the same way, on a genuinely different foundation.
Validated assessment
We build on established, peer-reviewed instruments, never a proprietary test we've invented ourselves.
Standardized scoring
Results are scored using each instrument's own published rules. The logic is never a black box.
Structured report
Raw responses become a clear, readable report, for a clinician, a researcher, or a family.
Human decision
The report informs the call. It never makes it. That line doesn't move, product to product.
What changes is the vocabulary, not the architecture.
Swap the instrument and the decision-maker, and the underlying pipeline is identical across all three products.
| Product | 1. Assessment | 2. Scoring | 3. Report | 4. Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Track | PHQ-9, GAD-7 + more | Auto-scored, clinical rules | Clinical dashboard | Clinician decides |
| Lab | Go/No-Go, Stroop, N-back + more | Auto-scored, timing data | Results report | Researcher decides |
| Compass | RIASEC assessment | Auto-scored, framework rules | Career & subject report | Family decides |
Instruments and paradigms shown are examples, not the full list; each product's assessment set expands as we work with more partners.
No instrument here. Real law, in its place.
Map is not a fourth version of the table above. There's no validated instrument to score against, so nothing is auto-scored and there's no clinical or research report. The discipline is the same, build the infrastructure, not the underlying standard, applied to a genuinely different foundation.
| Product | 1. Classify | 2. Ground | 3. Attest | 4. Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map | Feature classified against every jurisdiction it actually touches | Real, current, primary-source data-protection & AI-specific law, not a template | Every item gets a named owner, real evidence, and a real due date | Executive decides, sign-off carries a real, named audit trail |
Map also tracks the organizational change work required to actually adopt a feature, using Kotter's 8 steps and a McKinsey 7S diagnostic, alongside the compliance record, not merged into it.
Want to see how it works?
Request a demo of Track, Lab, Compass, or Map, and we'll walk you through exactly how it would work for your clinic, lab, school, or compliance team.